Linguistic Evidence in Criminal Investigations

Authors

  • كمال ابريعش كلية الآداب والعلوم الإنسانية- جامعة محمد الخامس بالرباط

Keywords:

Forensic Linguistics, Linguistic Evidence, forensic linguistic expert, criminal investigation, conviction, acquittal

Abstract

testThis study examines the role of linguistic evidence in criminal investigations within the framework of forensic linguistics. Incriminal proceedings, convictions often depend on the careful examination of material evidence, such as DNA profiling. Yet courts rarely rely on linguistic evidence as the primary basis for serious criminal convictions, although language may, in certain cases, constitute compelling evidence either against or in favour of a suspect. The study introduces forensic linguistics as a field of inquiry, outlines its emergence and scope, and then investigates the function of linguistic evidence in criminal investigations. It does so by discussing selected well-known criminal cases in which language analysis by forensic linguistic experts contributed significantly to conviction or acquittal. Particular attention is given to the widely known French case of the early 1990s involving the Moroccan immigrant Omar Raddad, who was convicted of murdering his employer, Ghislaine Marchal, partly on the basis of the linguistic evidence represented by the phrase Omar m’a tuer.

References

Christensen, T. K. (2019). Indirect threats as an illegal speech act. The authors & Aarhus University.

Coulthard, M., and Johnson, A. (2007). An Introduction to Forensic Linguistics: Language in Evidence. Simultaneously published in the USA and Canada by Routledge.

Guillén-Nieto, V., and Stein, D. (2022). Introduction: Theory and practice in forensic linguistics. In V. Guillén-Nieto and D. Stein (eds.), Language as Evidence. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84330-4_1

Hammel, A. (2022). Linguistic expert evidence in the common law. In V. Guillén-Nieto and D. Stein (eds.), Language as Evidence. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84330-4_3

Vérité et manipulations d’opinions. Enfin une information contradictoire sur l’«Affaire Omar Raddad». Comment une femme lettrée a-t-elle pu commettre une telle faute d’orthographe? (27 février, 2023).

al-Fiʻl al-injāzī fī al-siyāq al-qaḍāʼī, Ḥāfiẓ Ismāʻīlī ʻAlawī, wa-Kamāl Ibrīʻish, Majallat Jāmiʻat al-Shāriqah lil-ʻUlūm al-Insānīyah wa-al-Ijtimāʻīyah, mujallad 21, al-ʻadad (3), 54-77, 2025, https://doi.org/10.36394/jhss/22/3/5

al-Lisānīyāt al-jināʼīyah: ishkālīyāt naẓarīyah wa-taṭbīqīyah fī al-qānūn al-jināʼī al-duwalī, Yūnus ʻAbd Allāh Muḥammad al-Dukhī al-ʻAbbādī, Dār Nūn lil-Ṭibāʻah wa-al-Nashr, al-ʻIrāq, ṭ. 1, 2024.

al-Lisānīyāt al-jināʼīyah: taḥqīq al-ʻadālah ʻan ṭarīq al-lughah, Anṭūnyūs Nādir, Mawqiʻ «Maʻná», mutāḥ ʻalá al-rābiṭ: https://mana.net/linguistics/

al-Lisānīyāt al-jināʼīyah: taʻrīfuhā, wa-majālātuhā, wa-taṭbīqātuhā, Ṣāliḥ ibn Fahd al-ʻUṣaymī, Dār Wujūh lil-Nashr wa-al-Tawzīʻ, al-Mamlakah al-Saʻūdīyah, al-Riyāḍ, ṭ. 1, 2021.

al-Lughah wa-al-qānūn, Bītar Tīrsmā, wa-Lūrāns Ṣūlān, tarjamat: Ḥāfiẓ Ismāʻīlī ʻAlawī, Dār Kunūz al-Maʻrifah, 2023.

Christensen, T. K. (2019). Indirect threats as an illegal speech act. The authors & Aarhus University.

Coulthard, M., and Johnson, A. (2007). An Introduction to Forensic Linguistics: Language in Evidence. Simultaneously published in the USA and Canada by Routledge.

Fiʻl kalām al-tahdīd fī siyāqāt al-qānūn al-jināʼī: muqārabah tadāwulīyah, Kamāl Ibrīʻish, Majallat al-Lisānī, al-mujallad 3, al-ʻadad (khāṣṣ), 2026.

Guillén-Nieto, V., and Stein, D. (2022). Introduction: Theory and practice in forensic linguistics. In V. Guillén-Nieto and D. Stein (eds.), Language as Evidence. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84330-4_1

Hammel, A. (2022). Linguistic expert evidence in the common law. In V. Guillén-Nieto and D. Stein (eds.), Language as Evidence. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84330-4_3

ʻIlm al-lughah al-jināʼī: nashʼatuhu wa-taṭawwuruhu wa-taṭbīqātuhu, ʻAbd al-Majīd ʻUmar al-Ṭayyib, al-Majallah al-ʻArabīyah lil-Dirāsāt al-Amnīyah, 23, (45), 273-300, 2008.

ʻIlm al-lughah al-qaḍāʼī: muqaddimah fī al-lughah wa-al-jarīmah wa-al-qānūn, Jūn Ūlsūn, tarjamat: Muḥammad ibn Nāṣir al-Ḥaqbānī, Jāmiʻat al-Malik Saʻūd, al-Nashr al-ʻIlmī wa-al-Maṭābiʻ, 2008.

Muʻjam al-muṣṭalaḥāt al-lughawīyah, Ramzī Munīr al-Baʻlabakkī, Dār al-ʻIlm lil-Malāyīn, Bayrūt, Lubnān, ṭ. 1, 1990.

Vérité et manipulations d’opinions. Enfin une information contradictoire sur l’«Affaire Omar Raddad». Comment une femme lettrée a-t-elle pu commettre une telle faute d’orthographe? (27 février, 2023).

Published

2026-04-30

How to Cite

ابريعش ك. (2026). Linguistic Evidence in Criminal Investigations. DÂD Journal of Arabic Linguistics and Literature, 7(13), 45–65. Retrieved from https://www.daadjournal.com/daad/article/view/115

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.